Maski vs DuckDuckGo Email Protection: free is the whole argument, and it is a strong one
This is the shortest of these pages, because DuckDuckGo Email Protection is free, effectively unlimited, strips trackers out of your mail on the way through, and comes from a company whose entire business depends on not being caught misusing it.
I am not going to build a paragraph explaining why my paid thing beats a free thing at being free. It does not. If the requirement is zero pounds, the answer is Duck Addresses and you can close this tab.
Here is the narrow strip of ground where I think Maski is a better fit.
One is a feature, the other is a product
Email Protection is something DuckDuckGo built next to a search engine and a browser. That is not a criticism. It is why it can be free forever and why it does not need to justify itself with a roadmap.
But it also sets the ceiling. Their help pages describe address generation, forwarding and tracker removal, and they are honest that the compose mechanism is something they intend to improve in future updates. There is no plan tier where you get more, because there are no tiers.
Maski is the whole product rather than a feature beside one, which cuts both ways. It means per-sender rules and custom domains and a support address that answers. It also means it has to charge you eventually, and DuckDuckGo never will.